COMPANIES IN FOCUSCompanies named in our reports
RESEARCH BRIEFR54

Accra’s railway that never arrived: the $2 million SkyTrain payment on trial

The Ledgers Africa · Special Report

Accra did not get its proposed SkyTrain. A $2 million payment linked to the scheme did leave Ghana’s infrastructure fund, according to prosecutors. Two former fund leaders deny the charges. Their trial now centres on authorisation, the destination of the money and whether the prosecution can prove its case.

Share this report
Imagined architectural railway dissolving above an Accra-inspired city; an illustration of an unbuilt project.
AI-generated editorial illustration. It does not depict an actual scene or evidence. — The Ledgers

The record

The public promise and the payment

The proposal was an elevated rail system intended to ease congestion in Ghana’s capital. Ghana News Agency traces it to a 2018 memorandum with a South African consortium and a build-operate-transfer concession signed in November 2019. The proposed project cost was $2.6 billion. That estimate is separate from the $2 million transaction being tried. [1]

The defendants are Solomon Asamoah, former chief executive of the Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund, and Christopher Ameyaw-Akumfi, its former board chair. Prosecutors allege that the fund paid Africa Investor Holdings Limited in South Africa without the required board approval. Both defendants have pleaded not guilty. [1][2]

Where the court proceedings stand

The prosecution closed its evidence in May 2026. Defence lawyers then sought permission to argue that there was no case to answer. That application challenged whether the evidence was sufficient to require a defence; it was not, by itself, an acquittal. [1]

On 5 October, the High Court postponed the case-management conference to 19 October. According to Graphic Online, Asamoah’s lawyer asked it to allow the Supreme Court to consider an application seeking to stop the trial, listed for 13 October. The prosecution noted that filing such an application did not automatically suspend the High Court proceedings. These dates were still prospective when this report was prepared on 10 October. [2]

What the missing railway does not prove

An unbuilt project is a serious accountability issue, but it does not alone establish a defendant’s criminal intent. The evidential questions are narrower: what authority covered this payment, what consideration was promised, what records document its use, and how do the defendants answer the allegations?

The prosecution’s statement that it could not trace the money remains its allegation, not a finding of conviction. [1] For citizens, the useful distinction is between explaining why a transport promise failed and proving who committed a crime. The trial must resolve the criminal allegations. The fund’s decisions also deserve public scrutiny now.

Based on reporting from: Ghana News Agency · Prosecution closes its case · 20 May 2026; Graphic Online · Trial adjourned to 19 October · 5 October 2026.

Source documents

02
  1. Ghana News Agency · Prosecution closes its case · 20 May 2026gna.org.gh
  2. Graphic Online · Trial adjourned to 19 October · 5 October 2026graphic.com.gh

File updates

  1. First published

    Report published

  2. Status updated

    Completed

    Editorial research status recorded.

Editorial note

The Ledgers Africa: a source-based review of the dated court records, company statements and reporting listed below. This is not a claim of original field reporting. The parties were not approached separately for this account. Editorial status is separate from the legal status of a case.

Submit a response or correction ↗
Share this report
THE LEDGERS / COMMUNITY

Reader comments

Verified members can comment. Comments appear after editorial approval. Please address the evidence and avoid personal information.

No published comments yet.

Sign in / Create account →